The Hidden Cost of Employee Health Plan Choices
Many employees pick health plans that cost them more in every scenario. Learn how “dominated” plans drain budgets and how Budgie prevents it.
Many employees pick health plans that cost them more in every scenario. Learn how “dominated” plans drain budgets and how Budgie prevents it.

Choice sounds great in theory. But what if one of the plans you’re offering your employees should never be chosen?
That’s not a hypothetical. It’s what’s known as a “dominated” plan option — and it’s more common than most employers realize.
Most employers provide at least two medical plan options. On paper, that feels empowering. Employees can select what fits their needs and budgets.
But sometimes, one of those plans is objectively worse across the board. No matter how much or how little healthcare an employee uses, they’ll always spend more under that plan compared to the alternatives.
We call these dominated plans. And they quietly drain money from employees and organizations alike.
That’s not the kind of “choice” you want to provide.
Employees don’t set out to make bad financial choices. They’re facing:
Without clear, personalized guidance, it’s no surprise so many people end up in objectively worse plans.
When employees pick dominated plans:
All while employers are left wondering why their benefits ROI looks flat.
Budgie’s analytics engine identifies when dominated plan options exist in your benefits design. We run employee claims history and plan designs to show — concretely — how each employee would have fared under each option.
That means:
Instead of draining budgets and trust, your plan design becomes a strategic advantage.
Choice only matters when it’s real. Dominated plans offer the illusion of choice — but at a hidden cost to employees and employers alike.
With Budgie, you can ensure every health plan option has a purpose and every employee has a fair shot at choosing wisely.



