Benefits Equity: Why Plan Design Choices Hurt Some Groups More
Not all benefits are created equal. Learn how plan design can disadvantage women, older employees, and low earners—and how Budgie helps close the gap.
Not all benefits are created equal. Learn how plan design can disadvantage women, older employees, and low earners—and how Budgie helps close the gap.

Most employers care deeply about equity. They invest in DEI programs, review pay structures, and strive to create inclusive workplaces.
But there’s a hidden equity issue many organizations miss: their own health plan design.
Even well-structured benefits can unintentionally disadvantage women, older employees, and lower earners. And the result is employees carrying disproportionate financial burdens simply because of how options are presented.
Sometimes, employers offer multiple plans — but one is objectively worse in every scenario. These are known as dominated plans.
Employees enrolled in dominated options end up paying more no matter what care they use. The kicker? Vulnerable groups are most likely to end up in these plans.
The result? A benefits design that unintentionally widens financial inequity.
When certain groups consistently lose out on plan value:
Benefits equity isn’t just a social responsibility issue. It’s a financial and cultural one.
Forward-thinking employers are rethinking benefits equity, focusing on:
Budgie Health helps employers close the equity gap in benefits:
Instead of perpetuating inequity, benefits become a lever for fairness and financial wellbeing.
Equity isn’t just about paychecks. It’s about making sure every employee has an equal chance to maximize the value of their benefits.
Plan design matters. Guidance matters. Data matters.



